Das eez kaput! Sometime around 2002 I spaced the entire database table that mapped individual entries to categories. Such is life. What follows is a random sampling of entries that were associated with the category. Over time, the entries will be updated and then it will be even more confusing. Wander around, though, it's still a fun way to find stuff.
But since the Bush administration was willing to bring in a Hollywood producer to design a $250,000 set for the Central Command briefings, it might at least remind officials that we are not invading Eye-rack, but Ee-rack.
I am so with the Idea of RDF but it's never going to happen, certainly not the way people who wax poetic about it seem to imagine. RDF strikes me as the datetime problem writ large, an increasingly pendantic debate to define what the meaning ofEfforts in the past to herd all the existing module authors towards a common API have failed, so rather than try that again, I decided to just write even more datetime code. As we all know, the best way to put out a fire is to pour copious amounts of gasoline on it. In order to make my project sound cool, I'm calling it the "Perl DateTime Suite", which sounds much better than "more date and time modules".
is
is. By way of example, a careful reader will note that
during the discussion of Daylight Savings Time in article
cited no mention is made of the fact that Saskatchewan
doesn't bother with the practice at all; most farmers are
bit too busy for that kind of thing and who can blame them?
So fine, go ahead and add another ruleset your RDF thingy
but sooner or later all RDF thingies are just going to be
little more than a collection of monster if/else statements
(because the farmers aren't going adopt DST just to make
your whiz-bang network enable font of knowledge happy. In
every essay I've seen about RDF, the author say something
to the effect of
why is something so simple, so hard for people to understand?The answer is pretty straightforward : because, for good or ill, people are hell-bent on making it difficult. Why, if RDF is so simple, does it have all this baggage? What the hell is a
Class
and why do I need to care? Why, if all this nonsense, is
meant for machines do people push as something that humans
should feel all warm and fuzzt about? RDF is a perfectly
good framework for exchanging data and describing things.
Period. But please stop thinking that it is a suitable
vehicle for condensing all of human experience and
automating human interaction. see also :
strikes me as more event-like than freebusy-like
and
banque de déppanage linguistique
which, with a name like that, ought to tell you
something.
;; This packages enables you to create new posts and edit old posts on ;; your Movable Type Weblog. It may be expanded so that any weblog ;; tool that supports the metaWeblog API can be used.
"a little bit of something, as in food or drink"
ex. "How big of a piece of cake do you want?" "Just a dibble."see also : dibble dict-ified
short for Timberland boots (highly thought of in the hip-hop/rap community)
ex. Yo . . .B! Those tims are off the hook!
IsaViz is a visual environment for browsing and authoring RDF models represented as graphs.
When a person tries to speak, but burps instead.
ex. The crowd was amused by her spurp.
http://aaronland
.info
/weblog/category/(NAME|ID)/recent
. So far, formatting consists of a slightly modified
version of Eric van der Vlist's
10-to-xhtml.xsl
stylesheet. This is unlikely to change in the near-term and
is part of larger aaronland migration issues that have
dragging around for most of last year. Alas.